Skip to main content

Are Human Beings a part of Nature?

It is often a question for intelligent creatures, that if they themselves are a part of nature or the controller of nature. This question has taken men into surprising conclusions throughout the history. The evolution of religion, philosophies and even modern ethics is a part in the quest of that question.

In search of an answer for this, we may end up in contradictory conclusions. First, if we are a part of nature then, we need to justify every act of ourselves including pollution, unscientific use of natural resources and everything which is considered destructive today because of our artificial indulgences. At the same time, if we consider ourselves not a part of nature, then we have to admit that we have a certain amount of control which others don't, which simply means that we are unnatural, or perhaps supernatural, whatever you may call it.

But as a student In the Quest of Truth I must not break its basic rule of being 'Natural'. On the same context I had earlier written the post 'Are Miracles Religious?'. But now, this post is in a dilemma of justifying the basic rule of 'Being Natural'. But this dilemma can be easily solved using the fundamental law of nature, which is the Law of Creation and Destruction.

Life to death is what is seen in every creation in this world. As Siddhartha (Buddha) says, "Every compounded thing is bound to decay", and as the Quran recites, "How can you disbelieve in GOD when you were dead and He gave you life, then He puts you to death, then He brings you back to life, then to Him you ultimately return?"

All created things are bound to get destroyed, from life to death, from atom to energy, from Big Bang to Big crunch, and so are we, in fact there is no exception in science and if there is any exception then that is an unknown 'science'. So is the answer here, yes human beings are a part of nature. If human beings are a part of nature, then what about the ethical problems associated with it? For example, can we justify the destruction taking place on earth? Can we justify the war, and all the suffering taking place? Nature has to justify it, because it is not due to any deliberate attempt by supernatural human ability, but just a course of nature.

Pollution is inevitable; destruction is a process, finally as in the case of every created things our earth also needs to be destroyed. Now what about the efforts done by certain human souls to slow down the process by a lot of environmental activism, ecological sustainable programs, conservatory measures etc.

Now it is not the question of who is right or wrong. But according to the previous post, ' A Treasure Within!', "Good is something which helps the propagation of your species (humanity) to live ahead. While, bad is something which destroys your species." Thus those who attempt destruction are bad in human eye. And they are normally punished by the civilized society. Well the punishment causes the suppression or death of the destroying elements. At the same time the constructive attempts by environmentalists etc are suppressed by the 'bad' elements. If we genuinely consider who these bad elements are, then we must agree that almost all of us are. The exorbitant way of life that we all are succumbed to, is itself the cause of destruction. The 'bad' elements that we perceive are really a minor share of the destruction.

Thus Human Beings are a part of Nature and so is the creation and destruction. No one can stop the destruction. It is really unfortunate that we cannot bring into account any sturdy way of life to reduce the pace of destruction. But, if there is any way to do this then the only possible way is to live in accordance with the nature. To adapt a simple way of life, a life which uses the values which suppress the negative elements that can be understood by common sense like greed, anger and so on. This will only help in the delay in our own destruction, but can never stop it. Even that delay is predetermined!


  1. great blog!..well, yah ur definetly ryt, humans wer part of nature..every one contributes to the cycle of life, every bit, in everything we have our part, our own contribution...
    But hey, we can avoid destruction if we care, lets just say not in a great percentage, a 100 nahh...but da possibility, i cud say yes we stil can
    if we all cooperate and agree to one goal then..its just it!!...
    Bless yah mah friend...good blog..

  2. This essay has various fallacies. For example you said that since everything that is considered a part from nature has a beginning and has an end (which is an extrapolation therefore probabilistic. You took this as a premise and did not argue in its favor. Energy is certainly a part of nature and it cannot be destroyed, I did not even made a rigorous investigation and here is a counter argument for something that you did not even sustained on the first place) therefore the earth itself must end and since Humans are contributing to the destruction of the Earth they are part or nature

    Another fallacy; assuming that all the things in nature actually have an end, you can see that they end without an intervention of an external conscious being ( who could have the choice to stop destroying the earth) and they also end inevitably and naturally. For example the body gets wear by the use of its parts, by walking the knees get wear, by eating the teeth get wear. This destruction is inevitable. In contrast, man could choose to act differently by creating a consciousness of the importance of the maintenance of nature therefore not being a destructive agent and by definition escaping from what you consider a part of nature.

    Why is the delay predetermined?? You did not sustain this


Post a Comment

Feel free to share your thoughts, opinions, ideas and suggestions.